<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HCoder.org &#187; upgrading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hcoder.org/tag/upgrading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hcoder.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:17:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sucky Typo update</title>
		<link>http://hcoder.org/2008/08/19/sucky-typo-update/</link>
		<comments>http://hcoder.org/2008/08/19/sucky-typo-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emanchado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day I was talking about upgrading Typo. The update itself went well, true, and the site was up and running without too much downtime, but then I started using it again&#8230; and I have noticed two things so far (both about writing posts) that I really dislike: First, the good old editor is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day I was talking about <a href="http://hcoder.org/2008/08/07/">upgrading Typo</a>. The update itself went well, true, and the site was up and running without <em>too much</em> downtime, but then I started using it again&#8230; and I have noticed two things so far (both about writing posts) that I really dislike:</p>
<p>First, the good old editor is not there anymore: the Typo editor used to be really good, because on the left hand side you had a very reliable and easy to use textarea with Wiki syntax (you can choose which exact syntax you want), and on the right hand side you had a &#8220;live preview&#8221; of your post, automatically updated with Ajax, that showed you how the post was going to look like. Well, that&#8217;s <strong>gone</strong>. Now there are two options: some retarded <span class="caps">WYSIWYG</span> box, that I tried to use and failed, and some good old textarea&#8230; <em>without the damn live preview</em>. That <strong>sucks</strong> big time, because there is <em>no other preview</em> (that I have seen: <strong>please</strong> enlighten me if there is indeed one), so I just blindly write things in a Wiki format, and <strong>hope</strong> that it&#8217;s going to look OK when I press &#8220;Publish&#8221;.</p>
<p>Second, I was playing with the Wiki format for the articles, and I changed it to &#8220;Markdown&#8221; (I always mix &#8220;Textile&#8221; with &#8220;Markdown&#8221;, and never remember which is which; the one I prefer is Textile). After I hit &#8220;Save&#8221;, not only the next article was parsed in Markdown format by default, but <strong>every single blog post</strong>. It&#8217;s like, you select the parser the system is going to use to interpret your whole blog. How retarded is that? Once you have written posts, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to change their syntax (unless you do it manually editing the post itself). <strong>Clearly</strong> the format is a property of each blog post, not of the whole blog installation.</p>
<p>Not everything is bad though: it seems that now you finally have a &#8220;Draft&#8221; concept, so I can start writing a blog post and just save as a draft, instead of unticking the &#8220;Online&#8221; property and saving as a normal post. Also, the drafts are saved <em>automatically</em>, so I don&#8217;t have to remember to hit &#8220;Save&#8221; from time to time just in case the browser crashes or I hit something stupid and erase the contents of the post. Yay for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hcoder.org/2008/08/19/sucky-typo-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Haberdasher and Rails 2.0</title>
		<link>http://hcoder.org/2008/03/02/haberdasher-and-rails-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://hcoder.org/2008/03/02/haberdasher-and-rails-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emanchado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haberdasher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m kind of back to Haberdasher work, so I&#8217;m playing again with Rails. However, I&#8217;m a very late adopter for many things, and that included Rails because I wasn&#8217;t that interested in investing time in learning all the new stuff and porting my applications to the new version. But the universe had its own ideas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of back to Haberdasher work, so I&#8217;m playing again with Rails. However, I&#8217;m a very late adopter for many things, and that included Rails because I wasn&#8217;t that interested in investing time in learning all the new stuff and porting my applications to the new version.</p>
<p>But the universe had its own ideas about Rails 2.0 and me, so I had some retarded compatibility problems with Haberdasher and the up-to-date <code>rake</code> utility version in Debian. The problems were related to some Rails plugins I was using, and they made me have a look at upgrading to Rails 2.0 from Rails 1.2. It turned out to be really easy to do, the hardest <em>by far</em> was replacing the plugins that gave problems with application code or other plugins (yes, I know that if I was going to get rid of them anyway, I might as well have stayed in Rails 1.2, I just thought it was a good idea to upgrade if I was going to resume Haberdasher development).</p>
<p>To be honest I haven&#8217;t really learned new stuff yet. I&#8217;m just using the same things I was using, only now powered by Rails 2.0. A couple of improvements/clean ups in syntax, deprecated code removal and similar, but nothing big yet.</p>
<p>The other news is that now that I have a working Haberdasher again, I&#8217;m making some changes I had in mind since months ago, namely adding some user preferences &#8220;framework&#8221;, and adding the ability to assign a copyright notice to the patches (with a configurable default notice per user, hence the user preferences). I haven&#8217;t published this work yet, but I plan to do it in a couple of days, after updating the demo installation and checking that everything&#8217;s alright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hcoder.org/2008/03/02/haberdasher-and-rails-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
